What
do today’s despots think about women? As
evidenced by Donald Trump’s disgusting and vulgar comments condoning sexual
assault, our current cadre of authoritarian figures consistently display their
disdain for women. Indeed, when trying to understand the ideology that
underlies the rise of these charismatic figures one must recognize how vital
misogyny is to the messaging of the aforementioned political characters. Ever
since Trump’s debate argument with Fox News’ Megyn Kelly, and the
subsequent derogatory remarks he directed at Kelly, Donald Trump’s male
chauvinism has been well documented. Whether it’s his
critique of Sec. Clinton’s “stamina,” or his ex-wife
Ivana’s accusations of rape, Trump’s treatment of women has been
characterized by sexism and sexual violence. And now, after the recent uncovering
of his 2005 interview with Access Hollywood’s Billy Bush, in which he described
how he sexually assaulted women, Trump’s hateful attitude toward women has become
the salient issue of his campaign. Importantly, this sexism is a common trait
amongst a significant amount of male totalitarians. Rodrigo Duterte, the
president of the Philippines, embodies this characteristic in a specifically
egregious way. When
he was running for president Duterte made disgusting remarks “referencing a 36-year-old
Australian lay minister named Jacqueline Hamill, who was held hostage, raped,
had her throat slashed and was shot in 1989.”
All the women were raped so during the first assault, because they
retreated, the bodies they used as a cover, one of them was the corpse of the
Australian woman lay minister. Tsk, this is a problem. When the bodies were
brought out, they were wrapped. I looked at her face, son of a bitch, she looks
like a beautiful American actress. Son of a bitch, what a waste. What came to
mind was, they raped her, they lined up. I was angry because she was raped,
that’s one thing. But she was so beautiful, the mayor should have been first.
What a waste.
As everyone who has some knowledge of Filipino politics immediately
recognized, when Duterte laments that “the mayor should have” raped the women
first, he is talking about himself, the former mayor of Davao. It is so essential
to analyze Duterte, Trump and their contemporaries’ misogyny because it
presents a life-threatening danger to women around the world and acts as a
fulcrum aspect to their personas’. When attempting to project toughness and
strength, authoritarian entities of all varieties rely on sexist, hateful
language. Essentially reactionary actors, nefarious leaders like Duterte and
Trump use vulgar language and the threats of rape, sexual assault and sexual harassment
as tools to bolster their image as masculine demigods. As reactionaries, they
entrench their authoritarian programs by disavowing progressive, Universalist
notions of gender equality and replacing with a brutal patriarchy that
subjugates women and consolidates their power. Philosopher Slavoj Zizek’s
insights on this subject of gender and totalitarianism are particularly
instructive. Discussing
the religious extremist group Boko Haram, Zizek brilliantly articulates how megalomaniacs
use of sexism acts as a way to counteract global progress towards equality,
bring back pseudo-traditional values and construct a power structure that best
serves their interests.
Does the same not hold
for, say, Boko Haram? For certain Muslims the liberation of women appears as
the most visible feature of the destructive cultural impact of capitalist
modernization. Therefore, Boko Haram, which can be roughly and descriptively
translated as “Western education [of women specifically] is forbidden,” can
perceive itself as a way of fighting the destructive impact of modernization
when it imposes hierarchic regulation between the two sexes.
As predatory creeps
like Trump continue to talk about things like their daughter’s attractiveness, we
need to be diligent and mount serious critiques against the misogyny express by
these eminently dangerous demagogues. It is essential to recognize this not
only as the bigoted feelings of individuals but as something even more
destructive—the structural exploitation and domination of women. In conclusion,
when groups like Boko Haram and the GOP try to realize their dreams of a
male-dominated society through offensive machismo, promotion of sexual assault
and the backlash against gender equity, they are trying to accumulate power and
dominate their subjects.
I thought this article was well-written and succinct. Perhaps my question is: How do these misogynistic, male chauvinist pigs rile up a whole nation to the point that they have a shot at becoming the president of a country or (worse) inevitably become president? Duterte has and always will be a dictatorial liar and there were still millions of people who voted for him. My Facebook feed is always filled of posts from family members and friends back home in the Philippines who divinize Duterte. Understandably, extremely harsh poverty may have pushed the concept of "one-hit jackpots" (when pertaining to money) as a part of the Filipino culture. For many, he is the "one-hit jackpot" who will get rid of the terrible conditions in the Philippines, so they refuse to see the truth of his negative rhetoric.
ReplyDeleteI'm with you there. I was truly shocked when my family members acknowledged the Duterte comments as "bad" but they still wanted him to be president. I think that in regards to supporters of misogynistic figures such as Trump and Duterte, those particular people are being pulled by something so strongly that it will take a lot more than lewd comments. In the case of Duterte, I think patriarchal thinking is still ingrained in the rural masses, where safety and prosperity are more pressing issues than gender equality. A similar situation can be applied to Trump supporters, with the addition that I think they're more inclined to hate mainstream media and so will accuse it of caricaturing Trump or unfairly finding any means necessary to bring his campaign down while not doing the same to Hillary. It's not that all of those supporters hate the idea of gender equality (though I'm sure there's a horrifying amount of them who do), but they're in a mindset that other issues--increase in political correctness, abortion, government control--that are more pressing. I'm in a mindset where a person running for the highest office of a country should not have those kinds of thoughts at all. The only thing to do is to make sure other people know just how bad that having a misogynistic leader would be, and to make sure their votes reflect it. But honestly, that's easier said than done.
DeleteIt is very interesting that misogynistic leaders keep gaining power and that the world is either blind to it, or simply does not care. I think that says a lot about the values of the world as a whole. Why do we keep electing these misogynistic leaders? Nonetheless, in countries like Iceland, women in government are abundant. Maybe we should look to cultural and societal values in Iceland to understand how the US can further improve in breaking the glass ceiling.
ReplyDelete