As I scoured the internet for articles
that I could discuss in my critical blog post, I stumbled upon the Southern
Poverty Law Center’s concise (SPLC) description of the alt-right. In a few
words, the
SPLC managed to succinctly explain what drives this prejudiced political movement.
“The alt-right, which the Southern
Poverty Law Center defines as ‘a set of far-right ideologies, groups
and individuals whose core belief is that ‘white identity’ is under attack by
multicultural forces using ‘political correctness’ and ‘social justice’ to
undermine white people and ‘their’ civilization.”
What makes this relatively dry, dispassionate
definition so interesting is that the SPLC is perceptive enough to discern a
certain disdain for ‘political correctness’ as one of the driving force. Just look
at the anti-p.c. rhetoric spewed by prominent members of the alt-right intelligentsia.
Listening to, and reading, the
polemics of public intellectuals like Milo Yiannopoulos, it becomes fully
apparent that political correctness has animated the pepe-lovers as much as any
other issue. Of course, standing at the helm of the alt-right movement, Donald
Trump has adopted this anti-p.c. stance and made it one of the key issues in
his campaign. While there are innumerable examples of Trump’s scorn for
political correctness, nothing
throws this sentiment into sharper relief than his statements on Islam. The
most egregious example of this was when, in the wake of the horrific Orlando shooting,
Trump
released a press statement proclaiming, “I am trying to save lives and
prevent the next terrorist attack. We can't afford to be politically correct
anymore.”
So,
if Trump and his acolytes believe that political correctness makes people fragile
(a criticism that’s not only been made by the alt-right but also respectable
publications like The Atlantic),
one would expect Trump to be a resilient candidate who is able to easily brush
off any criticism, right? After Monday night’s debate, apparently not. A
classic example of failing to live up to one’s own ideal, Trump’s
constant framing of his critics, specifically Rosie O’Donnell and Hillary
Clinton, as “vicious” and mean betrays a frailness that the alt-right
usually associates with political correctness.
You know, Hillary is hitting me with
tremendous commercials. Some of it’s said in entertainment. Some of it’s said—somebody
who’s been very vicious to me, Rosie O’Donnell, I said very tough things to
her, and I think everybody would agree that she deserves it and nobody feels
sorry for her. But you want to the truth? I was going to say something…extremely
rough to Hillary, to her family, and I said to myself, ‘I can’t do it. I just
can’t do it. It’s inappropriate. It’s not nice.’ But she spent hundreds of
millions of dollars on negatives ads on me, many of which are absolutely untrue.
They’re untrue. And they’re misrepresentations. And I will tell you this, Lester: It’s not nice. And I don’t deserve
that.
Watching
the debate, I found it to be extremely rich that a man who beckons us to be tough
on Islam gets so outraged by a couple of biting comments by people
he’s offended in the most repulsive ways possible. Furthermore, Trump’s
tenderness begs the question: Can you really be the archetype of the politically-incorrect
strongman when you cannot help but tell the world how much Rosie O’ Donnell
hurt your precious feelings? Though the obvious answer is no, maybe the
paradoxical nature of Trump as an authoritarian figure and petulant crybaby is
emblematic of the alt-right as a whole. It’s no wonder that, while they fashion
themselves as courageous fighters in the war against politically correct
America, the members of the alt-right always see themselves as a marginalized
group. In a way, Trump’s debate performance showed that, despite their anti
p.c. protests, those who associate with the far right are as sensitive as the
politically correct strawmen they constantly rail against. Trump and friends
can bloviate all they want about how tough they are; it still doesn’t change
who they are—a bunch of sniveling cowards.
No comments:
Post a Comment